Legal Opinion
Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations v. Seay
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 8, 1956No. 5284_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
235 F.2d 30
The CHOCTAW AND CHICKASAW NATIONS, Appellants,
v.
Wilmer D. SEAY; J. B. Stoddard; Philip H. Broun; Bridwell Oil Company, a co-partnership composed of J. S. Bridwell, Margaret Browdle and Frank Browdle; Long, Yingling and Lauck, a co-partnership composed of M. J. Long, E. V. Yingling and D. R. Lauck; and Continental Oil Company, a corporation, Appellees.
No. 5284.
United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.
June 8, 1956.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED W. F. Semple, Tulsa, Okl. (Lynn Adams, Oklahoma City, Okl., and Lee Welch, Antlers, Okl., on the brief), for appellants.
Richard R. Linn,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Railroad Co. v. SchurmeirSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Oklahoma v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Whitaker v. McBrideSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Hardin v. SheddSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bear v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1985
- Kal-O-Mine Industries, Inc. v. Camp (In Re Lumpkin Sand & Gravel, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 1989
- Bradford V. United States ex rel. Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management Division of Lands & MineralsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- James v. LangfordDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1981
- Bradford V. United States ex rel. Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management Division of Lands & MineralsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.