Legal Opinion

Hoyt Heater Co. v. Hoyt

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 27, 1945No. Civ. 14815PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

Defendant appeals on the judgment roll alone, from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, after trial before the court without a jury, in an action to restrain defendant from using his name in a competitive business either alone or in combination with other words.

The undisputed facts are these:

The defendant, whose trade name is Charles H. Hoyt, has been engaged in the business of a plumber and water heater repairer in Los Angeles County for more than twenty years. Plaintiff and its predecessors in name and interest have been engaged in the business of manufacturing, selling, repairing and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lotts v. Board of Park CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. Dodge Stationery Co. v. DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. American Automobile Ass'n v. American Automobile Owners Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Dunston v. Los Angeles Van & Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Allen v. MeyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kompf v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. MacSweeney Enterprises, Inc. v. TarantinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Alkus v. Johnson-Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Jackman v. MauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Visser v. MacResCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API