Legal Opinion

Jackman v. Mau

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 21, 1947No. Civ. 15610PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from an adverse judgment in action for an injunction to restrain defendant from using the name “ Jaekmau of Hollywood” in connection with his business, upon the ground that such name conflicts with plaintiffs’ prior established trade names, devices and labels, injured plaintiffs in their business, their good will and reputation, and misled, confused and deceived the public.

At the trial, it was established by stipulation or testimony that plaintiffs are copartners, conducting a manufacturing business under the fictitious name of “M. Jackman & Sons.” This partnership…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Scandinavia Belting Co. v. Asbestos & Rubber Works of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
  3. Alhambra Transfer & Storage Co. v. MuseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Hoyt Heater Co. v. HoytCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Ward-Chandler Building Co. v. CaldwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Stork Restaurant, Inc. v. SahatiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  2. People Ex Rel. Mosk v. National Research Co. of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Lane Bryant, Inc. v. Maternity Lane, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  4. MacSweeney Enterprises, Inc. v. TarantinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Boice v. StevensonArizona Supreme Court · 1947

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API