Legal Opinion

Visser v. MacRes

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 20, 1963No. Civ. 7076PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.

The issue on this appeal is whether the use of a business name incorporating the name of the person using the same, under the circumstances, constituted unfair competition.

In July 1956, the plaintiffs, respondents herein, purchased a florist business from the defendants Mary Maeres and Eliz abeth Fisehle who are the mother and sister, respectively, of the defendant, Albert Macres, the appellant herein. At the time of purchase the business in question was operated by the sellers in the City of Anaheim under the name of “Macres Florist”; occupied a storeroom owned by them; and produced annual…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Lane Bryant, Inc. v. Maternity Lane, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  3. Dodge Stationery Co. v. DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Winfield v. CharlesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Family Record Plan, Inc. v. MitchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cairns v. Franklin Mint Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1998
  2. Ball v. American Trial Lawyers Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Cairns v. Franklin Mint Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2000
  4. North Carolina Dairy Foundation, Inc. v. Foremost-McKesson, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. MacSweeney Enterprises, Inc. v. TarantinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API