Dunston v. Los Angeles Van & Storage Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Walter Bordwell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Plaintiff alleged that in the year 1896, in the city of Los Angeles, he established the business of moving, hauling, trucking and storing. To this business he gave the name of “Los Angeles Van, Truck & Storage Company.” In 1902 he made application to the state of California to have that name registered and trademarked, and on the thirteenth day of August, 1902, there was issued to plaintiff a certificate by the secretary of the state of California “granting said R. H. Dunston the sole and exclusive right to use and appropriate said name of Los Angeles Van, Truck & Storage Company to his said…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Canal Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- American Waltham Watch Co. v. United States Watch Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
- Newman v. . AlvordNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Shaver v. ShaverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
- Ruggles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- American Automobile Ass'n v. American Automobile Owners Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- MacSweeney Enterprises, Inc. v. TarantinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Schwartz v. Slenderella Systems of California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Fidelity Appraisal Co. v. Federal Appraisal Co.California Supreme Court · 1933
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.