Legal Opinion

Wall v. Studebaker Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1922No. Docket No. 5PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error to Wayne; Goff (John H.), J. Case by Fred C. Wall against the Studebaker Corporation for loss of wages of minor son in defendant’s employ. Judgment for defendant on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

The plaintiff is the father of Harry C. Wall, a minor, who was injured on the 3d day of July, 1918, while employed by the defendant. The defendant is a Michigan corporation engaged in the business of manufacturing automobiles in the city of Detroit. ' This suit was brought by the father to recover wages lost by the minor by reason of his injuries. The case was tried on a stipulated statement of facts, from which it appears that Harry C. Wall suffered injuries to his hand while working on a punch press which was operated by electricity; that the injury was the result of negligence of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. King v. Viscoloid Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Mackin v. Detroit-Timkin Axle Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Buonfiglio v. R. Neumann & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1919
  4. Adkins v. Hope Engineering & Supply Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Naudzius v. LahrMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Husted v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Valley Nat. Bank of Phoenix v. GloverArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Roxana Petroleum Co. v. CopeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Jordan v. CA Roberts CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1967

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API