Buonfiglio v. R. Neumann & Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Swayze, J.
This action is brought by a father for pecuniary loss to him caused by an injury to -his minor son, a lad sixteen years of age. The son was in the employ of the defendant, to whose negligence the injury is attributed.
*175There was no express statement in writing or written notice that the provisions of section 2 of the Workmen’s Compensation act were not intended to apply, and, pursuant to paragraph 8, the parties are presumed to have accepted the provision of section 2, and to have agreed to he hound thereby. That the father was one of the…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Ferriter v. Daniel O'Connell's Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Roxana Petroleum Co. v. CopeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. ScruggsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Hilsinger v. Zimmerman Steel Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- Winn-Lovett Tampa v. MurphreeSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.