Merced Bank v. Rosenthal
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Merced County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
Upon due consideration of this cause, after hearing in Bank, we are satisfied with the conclusion reached and the opinion rendered in Department; and for the reasons therein given, the judgment and order appealed from are reversed and the court below is directed to enter judgment for the defendants on the findings.
The following is the decision above referred to, which was rendered in Department Two on the 28th of December, 1892: —
Temple, C.—
This action is brought to have a deed, absolute on its face, declared a mortgage,-and to obtain a foreclosure of the same. It is brought against…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
- Groesbeck v. SeeleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
- Bull v. CoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Petersilea v. StoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Barber v. BabelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Lee v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- MacLeod v. MoranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Ridout v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
- Ogden Building & Loan Ass'n v. MenschIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
- Faias v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.