Bland v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TOBRINER, J.
Petitioner seeks review of a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board (hereinafter board), after reconsideration, in which the board decided that petitioner should receive further medical treatment for his injuries but not compensation for temporary disability. The board refused such compensation on the sole ground that the petition to reopen did not specifically request it.
1. The facts.
After having worked steadily for some 17 years as a cement mason, petitioner undertook employment with McPhail’s, Inc., in Greenbrae, California. The McPhail job of finishing…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- LeVesque v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- French v. RishellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Granado v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Fruehauf Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Lundberg v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Redner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Blanchard v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Youngblood v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Belmontez v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Martino v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.