Legal Opinion

Granado v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

California Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1968No. S. F. No 22599PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

Petitioner seeks annulment of a decision after reconsideration by the Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board which apportioned liability for temporary disability compensation and medical treatment subsequent to April 1, 1966, 50 percent to respondent carrier and 50 percent to petitioner. The basis of the apportionment was a neck injury not industrially related suffered August 1961 and a subsequent industrial injury to the neck suffered April 13, 1965.

Petitioner urges :(1) temporary disability is not apportion-able; (2) medical treatment is not apportionable; and (3) even assuming that in a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Colonial Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommisionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Zemke v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Madin v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Smith v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. LeVesque v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Braewood Convalescent Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Goytia v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Department of Corrections v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Ballard v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API