Fruehauf Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMosk, J.
Petitioners, Fruehauf Corporation and its insurance carrier, seek review of a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board (hereinafter board) awarding compensation to Thomas C. Stansbury, an employee who suffered an industrial injury arising out of and in the course of his employment by Fruehauf.
Section 5405 of the Labor Code 1 provides, with exceptions not relevant here, that proceedings for the collection of disability payments and payments for medical and hospital treatment under the workmen’s compensation law must be commenced within one year from the date of injury. The term…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Marsh v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Winthrop v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Bianco v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Dow Chemical Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Mathews v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Lundberg v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Tucker v. in Death of GonzalesColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
- Coy v. Dover Corp./Norris DivisionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- J. T. Thorp, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.