Legal Opinion

Lundberg v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

California Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1968No. Docket No S.F. 22612PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*438PETERS, J.

Petitioner seeks annulment of an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board upon reconsideration that he did not suffer his back injury in the course of his employment.

On June 27, 1967, petitioner, while working as a carpenter, developed back pain. He did not recall any specific accident or other incident causing the injury. He was lifting 2 x 10 inch studs which were 20 to 22 feet long, and the work was heavier than usual. The pain continued in his hack and leg, and on July 5, he left work and consulted Dr. Portello. He told the doctor that his back and leg condition…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Fruehauf Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Truck Insurance Exchange v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. LeVesque v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Garza v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Lamb v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Goytia v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Baker v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API