Legal Opinion

Redner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

California Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1971No. L.A. 29846PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TOBRINER, J.

Although the referee in this workmen’s compensation case found upon an abundant showing that the applicant suffered a 57 percent disability, the appeals board granted reconsideration and held that applicant should receive nothing for permanent disability. The board rested its decision upon some motion pictures, deceitfully procured by the insurance carrier, which showed the applicant riding horseback. We shall point out that we cannot uphold the ruling since (1) the film had been deliberately withheld from the prior proceedings and improperly produced at the hearing on…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. LeVesque v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Duprey v. ShaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Warner Construction Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Garza v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. French v. RishellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Unruh v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Stafford v. Westchester Fire Insurance Co. of New York, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Paradissis v. Royal Indemnity CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Noble v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. Patty v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API