Legal Opinion

Fagerlie v. City of Willmar

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 21, 1989No. C1-88-1708, C6-88-1820PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERT E. BOWEN, Judge.

Appellants Walter and Doris Bryant, Ricky and Darla Fagerlie, and approximately 18 other families seek review of summary judgments dismissing their claims allegedly founded on negligence, trespass, and nuisance, as barred by the two-year statute of limitations in Minn.Stat. § 541.051, subd. 1 (1988). Appellants assert the six-year statute of limitations for liability created by statute in Minn.Stat. § 541.05, subd. 1(2) (1986) is applicable. We affirm.

FACTS

On June 1, 1977, respondent Short, Elliott, Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH) entered into a contract with respondent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Valley Farmers' Elevator v. Lindsay Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Ford v. Emerson Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Harold E. ADAMSON, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ARMCO, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  2. Johnson v. Paynesville Farmers Union Cooperative Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  3. Minch Family LLLP v. Buffalo-Red River Watershed DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  4. Nolan and Nolan v. City of EaganCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  5. Wendinger v. Forst Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API