Legal Opinion

Valley Farmers' Elevator v. Lindsay Bros.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 2, 1987No. C6-85-1639, C0-85-2057PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COYNE, Justice.

The plaintiff Valley Farmers’ Elevator has obtained further review of a decision of the court of appeals affirming the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of the defendant Lindsay Brothers Company. 380 N.W.2d 874. The effect of the decision was to dismiss the plaintiff's claim for economic loss arising from the damage to a grain storage system purchased from the defendant. We affirm.

Intending to expand its grain storage facilities, the plaintiff’s predecessor in interest, Wegdahl Co-operative Elevator Association, contacted Lindsay Brothers, a distributor of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Frances M. Bonebrake, Administratrix De Bonis Non of the Estate of Woodrow B. Simek, Deceased v. Donald Cox and Claude Cox, D/B/A Tamarack BowlCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  3. Superwood Corp. v. Siempelkamp Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Minneapolis Society of Fine Arts v. Parker-Klein Associates Architects, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. In Re Estate of DanielSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Hapka v. Paquin FarmsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. McCarthy Well Co. v. St. Peter Creamery, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Duxbury v. Spex Feeds, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  4. Golden v. Den-Mat Corp.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
  5. City of Willmar v. Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1991

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API