Legal Opinion

Harold E. ADAMSON, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ARMCO, INC., Defendant-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 24, 1995No. 93-3860PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOKEN, Circuit Judge.

For many years, Reserve Mining Company (“Reserve”) mined and processed taeonite iron ore deposits in northern Minnesota and shipped the processed taeonite to steel mills operated by Reserve’s parent companies, Republic Steel Corporation and appellee Armco, Inc. Republic and Armco operated Reserve as a “cost company,” paying Reserve’s operating expenses as incurred and causing Reserve to have no net earnings. In mid-1986, beset by environmental and economic adversities, Reserve ceased operations and filed a petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.

Reserve…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Braden v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  2. Pens. Plan Guide P 23918c Raymond K. Panaras v. Liquid Carbonic Industries Corporation and Cbi Industries, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  3. Hastings v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  4. George W. Henglein v. Colt Industries Operating CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  5. Felix v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API