Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Successor to Claims of First Federal Bank, F.S.B. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided October 16, 1996No. 95-3298PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, Circuit Judge.
This case is before us for the second time following our earlier remand to the district court based on our conclusion that a blanket bond’s two-year contractual limitations period is valid under South Dakota law. See RTC v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co., 25 F.3d 657, 659 (8th Cir.1994). We briefly reiterate the facts for the purposes of our analysis in the present appeal.
Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (Hartford) issued a standard savings and loan blanket bond (bond) for the now-defunct First Federal Bank (First Federal). The bond provided broad coverage for losses…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Prudential-LMI Commercial Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Peloso v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Johnson v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Cromwell v. HosbrookSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
- In Re Certified QuestionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Thornton v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
- Richard B. Brozo v. Oracle Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Cindy Brillman v. New England Guaranty Insurance Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2020
- United States Ex Rel. Zissler v. Regents of the UniversityDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
- First Dakota National Bank v. BancInsure, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.