Legal Opinion

Cage v. General Motors Defined Benefit Salaried Plan

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 24, 1999No. 97-71143PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

EDMUNDS, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and on Defendants’ renewed motion for summary judgment. The Defendants maintain a pension plan. This case arises from Plaintiffs ERISA-based claims alleging denial of benefits and breach of fiduciary duty. Plaintiff also seeks a declaratory judgment stating that the class Plaintiffs 1 are entitled to the full amount of their benefits under the Plan; that the purported denial of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pfenning v. Liberty Life Assurance Co. of Bos.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2017
  2. Board of Trustees of the Southern Ohio Painters Health & Welfare Fund v. Sixth Region Remodeling, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
  3. House-Forshee v. Benefits Committee of Western & Southern Financial Group Company Flexible Benefits PlanDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API