Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Van Der Plate Co., Inc.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided August 5, 1942No. Docket 123/664PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a suit to compel performance of a contract not to engage in a competitive business within a specified area. Van Der Plate Co., Inc., and Jacob Van Der Plate entered into a contract with one Beckwermert individually, and in behalf of a company to be formed by him. By the terms of the contract the defendants sold a coal business conducted by them in Bloomfield, and agreed not to sell coal within a radius of five miles. The defendant agreed to furnish and deliver coal to Beckwermert customers at a price to allow the Beckwermert firm a profit of $1.25 a ton.

Beckwermert immediately formed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Trenton Potteries Co. v. OliphantSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
  2. Mandeville v. HarmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1886
  3. Scherman v. SternSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
  4. Weliky v. ZakrzewskiNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
  5. Finger v. HahnNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1887

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tri-Continental Financial Corporation v. Tropical Marine Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  2. Alexander S. v. Arnold ConstableNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  3. Heuer v. RubinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
  4. Tri-Continental Financial Corporation v. Tropical Marine Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API