Legal Opinion

Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Waddell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 7, 1951No. 105PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaenhill, J.

The judgment of the court below attempts to preclude the infant grandson of Francis C. Jordan, without notice and without a hearing. If, in fact, said infant “does not now and cannot ever have” any interest in the trust property, no harm is done by the decree. But such is not the case. The only disposition of the trust estate, at the termination of the trust, is contained in the direction that the property be then divided among the bodily heirs of testator’s nephew and niece, then surviving. To ascertain who are the ultimate takers, the roll must be called as of the day of the death of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carter v. KemptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. House v. HouseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Turpin v. . JarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. Conrad v. . GossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. Matthews v. . MatthewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Whitson v. BarnettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Pridgen v. TysonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Seawell v. CheshireSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Wachovia Bank and Trust Co. v. ChamblessCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. White v. AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API