Legal Opinion

Matthews v. . Matthews

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 28, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBabNhill, J.

The difficulty the courts have encountered in applying the rule in Shelley’s case does not arise out of any complexity in the rule itself. The application of the rule to particular facts presented is what has called forth much discussion in many decisions and which has caused such confusion as may exist in the minds of the legal profession in determining just when the rule applies. Generally speaking, the rule applies and a fee is conveyed when “heirs” or “heirs of the body” are used in their technical sense and carry the estate to the entire line of heirs to hold as inheritors under our…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Puckett v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. Pugh v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  3. Benton v. . BaucomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Wallace v. . WallaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  5. Price v. GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Whitson v. BarnettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Turpin v. . JarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. Cannon v. BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. WaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API