Pridgen v. Tyson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDbNNy, J.
It is conceded that the plaintiff, Thomas W. Pridgen, took only a life estate in the devised premises, under the will of Thomas M. Tyson, and that all persons claiming any interest in the estate are parties to the action. The defendants contend, however, that the male children of the testator took only a contingent interest conditioned upon their surviving Thomas W. Pridgen, the plaintiff, and that in order to ascertain the ultimate takers under the will, the roll must be called at the death of Thomas W. Pridgen, citing Trust Co. v. Waddell, 234 N.C. 34, 65 S.E. 2d 317; Carter v. Kempton, 233…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Witty v. WittySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Carter v. KemptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Chas. W. Priddy & Co. v. SanderfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Mercer v. . DownsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- House v. HouseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Parker v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Kale v. ForrestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- S. J. Groves & Sons & Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- WACHOVIA BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. McEwenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Central Carolina Bank & Trust Company v. BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.