Legal Opinion · Dissent

House v. House

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 14, 1949PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1DissentBarnhill, J.

This is an action begun as a special proceeding before the Clerk of the Superior Court of Wake County, for the sale of lands for partition.

Mrs. Dorcas Sealey and husband, Wade Sealey, Mrs. Estelle Richards and husband, D. E. Richards, Mrs. Otelia Ferrell and husband, W. R. Ferrell, and Mrs. Metta Straughn, were allowed to intervene and file pleadings.

The interveners allege that the devise of lands to Martha Virginia Paschal, under the will of Thomas Wesley House, was a devise in fee simple and that upon her death, the title to the lands vested in her heirs at law and next of kin.

Thomas Wesley…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Heyer v. BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. Heyer v. . BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Hilliard v. . KearneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1853
  4. Buchanan v. . BuchananSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  5. Williams v. . RandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Coppedge v. CoppedgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Entwistle v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Buffaloe v. BlalockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. McCain v. WombleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Efird v. EfirdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API