Legal Opinion

Seawell v. Cheshire

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 23, 1955No. 451PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.

The appellant states in brief filed in this Court two questions as being involved on this appeal. The first re^ds as follows: “Should the residue of the trust estate created under the will of B. S. Harrison, deceased, be now paid over to the executrix of the will of Edwin Marriott Harrison, the only son, and sole surviving heir at law of the testator, or should it be paid to the descendants and collateral heirs of persons named by the testator to take by conveyance to be made by the trustees after the death of testator’s son without lawful issue?”

This question raises the basic inquiry as to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. House v. HouseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Sain v. Baker.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  3. Weeks v. . WeeksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1847
  4. Fortescue v. . SatterthwaiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1841
  5. Patterson v. . McCormickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Little v. Wachovia Bank and Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Jernigan v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. White v. AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Hill v. FEDERAL LIFE AND CASUALTY COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Rawls v. EarlyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API