Legal Opinion

Brescia v. Ireland Coffee-Tea, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 1976No. Civ. A. 75-1771PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DITTER, District Judge.

Plaintiff, injured during the course of her employment, brought suit charging that defendants’ defective product was responsible. The defendants then initiated third party actions against plaintiff’s employer seeking contribution or indemnity. After the date on which plaintiff was hurt, the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act was amended to preclude third party suits against an employer and based on this amendment, plaintiff’s employer filed appropriate motions to have defendants’ claim dismissed. The question presently before the court is whether the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Maio v. FahsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Socha v. MetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Restifo v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Smith v. FennerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Bausewine v. Norristown Herald, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bell v. Koppers Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Slaughter v. Pennsylvania X-Ray Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  3. Moss v. Swann Oil, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Kohr v. Johns-Manville Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Wesolowski v. RhoadesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API