Legal Opinion

Slaughter v. Pennsylvania X-Ray Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 15, 1981No. 80-1564PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WEIS, Circuit Judge.

Because it had insufficient insurance coverage to pay the plaintiff a reasonable settlement, the target defendant in this diversity personal injury suit “borrowed” money from one of several alleged joint tortfeasors. Repayment was conditioned upon the defendant’s recovery of contribution from other tortfeasors. Rejecting a contention that the “loan” was in fact a settlement payment, the district court allowed recoupment. In addition, the court held that a recently enacted comparative negligence statute was not applicable in a contribution suit where the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Joseph v. LoweryOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Davis v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Smith v. FennerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Costa v. LairSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Cole v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  2. Bohna v. HUGHES, THORSNESS, GANTZAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Rocco v. Johns-Manville Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  4. National Liberty Life Insurance v. Kling PartnershipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Sochanski v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API