Kohr v. Johns-Manville Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
TROUTMAN, District Judge.
A grant of summary judgment is appropriate only when there is “no genuine issue as to any material fact”. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c), Bishop v. Wood, 341 U.S. 347,426 U.S. 341, 96 S.Ct. 2074, 48 L.Ed.2d 684 (1976), Arnett v. Kennedy, 416 U.S. 134, 94 S.Ct. 1633, 40 L.Ed.2d 15 (1974). The issue of material fact precluding the grant of summary judgment in the case sub judice involves determination of when the injuries of each plaintiff occurred.'
The moving defendants rely upon the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act, as amended, 77 P.S. § 481 (Supp.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Socha v. MetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Bell v. Koppers Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Hattersley v. BolltCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brezan v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Fleming v. MacK Trucks, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Gerard Tookmanian v. Safe Harbor Water Power Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Kohr v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Kohr v. Johns-Manville Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.