Legal Opinion

ANDERSON ET UX. v. Moothart

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1953PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPerry, J.

This is a suit brought by the plaintiffs as owners of real property situated in Tillamook county to perpetually enjoin the defendants from entering into and upon their property and logging and removing the timber thereon.

The defendants by answer ask that the injunction be denied and that the agreement of the parties be declared valid, or, in the alternative, that they have damages for the plaintiffs’ breach of the contract.

The injunction was denied, plaintiffs’ complaint dismissed, and judgment entered for the defendants for damages for breach of the contract.

The plaintiffs appeal.

This is a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Miami Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Seguin v. Maloney-Chambers Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Coquille Mill & Tug Co. v. Robert Dollar Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Belt Et Ux. v. MatsonOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Sorensen v. JacobsonMontana Supreme Court · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Blue River Sawmills, Ltd. v. GatesOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  2. CRAHANE v. SwanOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. George L. Jantzer Et At. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  4. Gerry v. JohnstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Bishop v. Du BoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API