Legal Opinion
Brusco Towboat Co. v. State Ex Rel. State Land Board
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided August 17, 1977No. 412016, CA 6407; 406393, CA 6407; 412017, CA 5989PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, J.
The basic issue in each of these three consolidated cases is the validity of rules promulgated by the State Land Board requiring users to enter into leases and to pay rent for the use of submerged and submersible lands underlying navigable waterways throughout the state.
The first case, an action in ejectment, was commenced by the Board against the Fort Vancouver Plywood Company to compel it either to enter into a lease for or to vacate submerged lands which it used for a log boom. It was treated below as a suit for declaratory judgment and it will be so treated here. The other two cases are…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Pollard's Lessee v. HAGANSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- Martin v. Lessee of WaddellSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State of California v. Superior Court (Lyon)California Supreme Court · 1981
- Eliopulos v. Kondo Farms, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1982
- Brusco Towboat Co. v. State Ex Rel. State Land BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Wasco County v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Local No. 2752Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- Morse v. Division of State LandsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.