Legal Opinion
State Nat. Bank v. Mee
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 18, 1913No. 3172PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; George W. Clark, Judge. Action by the State National Bank against Robert Mee and others to recover money judgment. Judgment for defendants on demurrer to petition, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
ROBERTSON, C.
This is an action by the State National Bank against Robert Mee, a notary public, and G. M. Stephenson and J. A. J. Baugus, sureties on the. notarial bond of said Robert Mee, to recover damages for failure to faithfully discharge his duties as such notary public. The material part of the petition reads as follows:
“Fourth. Plaintiff alleges that the said Robert Mee has failed to faithfully perform the duties required of him by law-as such notary public, and has been negligent in the performance and discharge of said duties, whereby this plaintiff has been damaged, for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Joost v. CraigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Heidt v. MinorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Barnard v. SchulerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Kleinpeter v. CastroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Wilson v. GribbenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dyal v. NortonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Probert v. CaswellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Clapp v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Effenberger v. DurantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Fred Ehlers v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.