Legal Opinion

Fred Ehlers v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1915No. 12703PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Kennan, J., entered November 21, 1914, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action on a surety bond.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The purpose of this action was to recover from the surety upon the bond of a notary public. The case was tried to the court and a jury. The defendant’s motion at the close of the plaintiffs’ case for a nonsuit, and its motion for a directed verdict at the close of the case, were denied. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs for the sum of $696. Motion for a new trial being made and overruled, a judgment was entered upon the verdict. The defendant appeals.

The facts are substantially as follows: On May 1, 1913, one J. E. Moe was engaged in the real estate business in the city…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth ex rel. Green v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  2. Barnard v. SchulerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  3. Howcott v. TalenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  4. State Nat. Bank v. MeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Werner v. WernerWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Meyers v. MeyersWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Lee James, Inc. v. CarrWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Meyers v. MeyersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  5. State v. HeyesWashington Supreme Court · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API