Dyal v. Norton
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Seminole County; Tom D. McKeown, Judge. Action by Susie Dyal against Sam Norton. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHardy, J.
Plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, brought suit in ejectment against defendant in error to recover possession of certain lands in Seminole county, being the allotment of plaintiff as a Seminole freedman. The answer was a general denial, and upon trial had on the 18th day of October, 1911, verdict was for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
The first assignment is that the court erred in overruling challenge of plaintiff in error to the juror McGee. The juror was examined fully upon his voir dire, both by counsel for plaintiff and by the court, and, after being thus examined, the challenge…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Campbell v. HarshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- City of Oklahoma City v. MeyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
- Bradford v. Territory of Oklahoma Ex Rel. WoodsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1894
- Hilsmeyer v. BlakeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Courtney v. DanielSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Scott v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Thompson v. InmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
- Fast v. GilbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Wolverine Oil Co. v. ParksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.