Legal Opinion
United States v. 74 Cases, Each Containing 48 Cans of C. C. Brand Oysters
District Court, W.D. South Carolina
Decided June 29, 1944No. 10373PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WYCHE, District Judge.
The above libel proceeding is based upon the charge of adulteration of oysters, and is now before me upon the motion of C C Company, intervening claimant, to transfer the cause from this district to the Southern District of Mississippi, where claimant’s principal place of business is. located.
Section 304(a) and (b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. A. § 334(a) and (b), sets forth the authority conferred upon district courts to proceed upon or to transfer seizure actions from one district to another. 1
The pertinent portion of section 304(a) deals…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Applegate v. ApplegateDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1941
- In re Thames Towboat Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1927
- Billings Utility Co. v. Federal Reserve BankDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1941
- In re Associated Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Spies v. Chicago & E. I. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1887
3Cited by7 opinions
- Clinton Foods, Inc. v. United States. Clinton Foods, Inc. v. Moore, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
- Brown v. HeinenDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1945
- States v. II Cases, More or Less, Ido-Pheno-ChonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1950
- United States v. 26 Dozen Bottles of Wheatamin Brand CevigardsDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1945
- United States v. 11 CASES, ETC.District Court, D. Oregon · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.