Legal Opinion

United States v. 26 Dozen Bottles of Wheatamin Brand Cevigards

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided March 23, 1945No. 1600PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAYMOND, District Judge.

Application of the principles of statutory construction discussed by Judge McAllister in the case of Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Strong Mfg. Co., 6 Cir., 124 F.2d 360, 364, results in the conclusion that the words “district of reasonable proximity to the claimant’s principal place of business” as used in Section 334(a) of Title 21 U.S.C.A., providing for removal for trial to another district of a libel for condemnation proceedings under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, do not include authority to remove to the district within which claimant’s principal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Strong Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  2. United States v. 74 Cases, Each Containing 48 Cans of C. C. Brand OystersDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1944
  3. United States v. SIX DOZEN BOTTLES, ETC.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1944

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. 23 GROSS JARS, ETC.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1949
  2. United States v. 91 PACKAGES, ETC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1950
  3. United States v. 353 Cases, More or LessDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API