States v. II Cases, More or Less, Ido-Pheno-Chon
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES ALGER FEE, Chief Judge.
A libel was commenced against certain goods shipped 'into this District from a point within the Southern District of 'California and found here. The charge is misbranding and adulteration. The goods were seized. Thereupon, claimant made a motion to transfer the cause to the Southern District of California or, if that be denied, to a district adjacent thereto'.
The problem raised by the motion is assumed to be of easy solution. For a District Court 'burdened with work, any move to remove a cause elsewhere is to be welcomed as a relief of some of the burden. But…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ellenwood v. Marietta Chair Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States v. 23 GROSS JARS, ETC.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1949
- In re MundorffDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1948
- United States v. 74 Cases, Each Containing 48 Cans of C. C. Brand OystersDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1944
- Brown v. HeinenDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1945
3Cited by5 opinions
- Clinton Foods, Inc. v. United States. Clinton Foods, Inc. v. Moore, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
- General Electric Co. v. Central Transit Warehouse Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1955
- United States v. ReidDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1952
- United States v. 11 CASES, ETC.District Court, D. Oregon · 1950
- United States v. an Article of Drug Consisting of 110 CartonsDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1972