Legal Opinion

States v. II Cases, More or Less, Ido-Pheno-Chon

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided August 31, 1950No. Civ. A. No. 5145PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES ALGER FEE, Chief Judge.

A libel was commenced against certain goods shipped 'into this District from a point within the Southern District of 'California and found here. The charge is misbranding and adulteration. The goods were seized. Thereupon, claimant made a motion to transfer the cause to the Southern District of California or, if that be denied, to a district adjacent thereto'.

The problem raised by the motion is assumed to be of easy solution. For a District Court 'burdened with work, any move to remove a cause elsewhere is to be welcomed as a relief of some of the burden. But…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ellenwood v. Marietta Chair Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. United States v. 23 GROSS JARS, ETC.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1949
  3. In re MundorffDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1948
  4. United States v. 74 Cases, Each Containing 48 Cans of C. C. Brand OystersDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1944
  5. Brown v. HeinenDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1945

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clinton Foods, Inc. v. United States. Clinton Foods, Inc. v. Moore, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
  2. General Electric Co. v. Central Transit Warehouse Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1955
  3. United States v. ReidDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1952
  4. United States v. 11 CASES, ETC.District Court, D. Oregon · 1950
  5. United States v. an Article of Drug Consisting of 110 CartonsDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API