Billings Utility Co. v. Federal Reserve Bank
District Court, D. Montana
1Opinion of the Court
PRAY, District Judge.
The above entitled action is before the court on a motion of the defendant, consisting of four paragraphs, the first of which is to dismiss on the ground that the complaint fails to state a claim against the defendant upon which relief can be granted; the second to dismiss for the reason that the action is brought in the wrong district, the defendant being a corporation incorporated under the laws of the United States with its main banking offices in the State of Minnesota, of which state the defendant is an inhabitant. The plaintiff asserts it is not seeking recovery…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- American Bank & Trust Co. v. Federal Reserve Bank of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Seaboard Rice Milling Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Matter of DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Bacon v. Federal Reserve BankDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1923
3Cited by4 opinions
- Billings Utility Co. v. Advisory CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- United States v. 74 Cases, Each Containing 48 Cans of C. C. Brand OystersDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1944
- Brown v. HeinenDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1945
- Billings Utility Co. v. Federal Reserve BankDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1942