Legal Opinion
United States v. 11 CASES, ETC.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided August 31, 1950No. Civ. A. No. 5145PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
94 F.Supp. 925 (1950)
UNITED STATES
v.
11 CASES, MORE OR LESS, IDO-PHENO-CHON et al.
Civ. A. No. 5145.
United States District Court D. Oregon.
August 31, 1950.
Henry L. Hess, U. S. Atty., and Floyd D. Hamilton, Asst. U. S. Atty., Portland, Or., for the Government.
Hart, Spencer, McCulloch, Rockwood & Davies, Portland, Or., for respondent and claimant.
JAMES ALGER FEE, Chief Judge.
A libel was commenced against certain goods shipped into this District from a point within the Southern District of California and found here. The charge is misbranding and adulteration. The goods were seized. Thereupon,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ellenwood v. Marietta Chair Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States v. 23 GROSS JARS, ETC.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1949
- In re MundorffDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1948
- United States v. 74 Cases, Each Containing 48 Cans of C. C. Brand OystersDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1944
- Brown v. HeinenDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. One 1974 Cessna Model 310r Aircraft, Etc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1977
- Puget Sound Tug & Barge Co. v. the Go GetterDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1952