Legal Opinion

People v. Morley

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 19, 1908No. Crim. No. 87PublishedCited by 19 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. B. N. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Earl Rogers, Paul W. Schenck, W. H. Dehm, and A. C. Hurt, for Appellants.

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, P. J.

Appeal by defendants from a conviction and an order denying a new trial.

The information filed charged the defendants jointly “of the crime of arson committed as follows”: That said parties (naming them) “on the 3d day of August, 1907, at and in the county of Los Angeles, state of California, did willfully, unlawfully and feloniously and maliciously burn, injure, and destroy certain property, to wit: certain household furniture' and other personal effects then and there in house (premises described), which was then and there the property of Henry Sanderson, and was then and there insured…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. AmedySupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  2. People v. EppingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. People v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. People v. Ah SamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  5. People v. TilleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. In Re TedfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. People v. AngelopoulusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. State v. MarascoUtah Supreme Court · 1933
  5. People v. GrossmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API