People v. Tilley
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, C.
The defendant was accused, by information, “of the crime of receiving stolen property, committed” as stated in the information, which, with necessary additions, follows the language of the statute. (Pen. Code, sec. 496.) The verdict of the jury was: “We, the jury in the above-entitled case, find the defendant, Chas. H. Tilley, guilty of receiving stolen property,” which was received and recorded, and judgment of conviction entered.
It is urged on behalf of the appellant that neither the information nor the verdict is sufficient to sustain the judgment, and that the court erred in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- People v. McCartyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- People v. DouglassCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- People v. CummingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- People v. ArnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by38 opinions
- State v. KuhnleyArizona Supreme Court · 1952
- People v. TongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- People v. FlohrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- People v. BratisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- People v. MacKabeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.