Legal Opinion

Benninger v. Derifield

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 2006No. 30999PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Chief Justice.

This case involves a claim for easement, nuisance, injunctive relief, and monetary damages by Joseph E. Benninger and Edith I. Benninger (the Benningers) against Thomas E. Derifield and Julie Freed (collectively, “Derifield”) for alleged interference and obstruction of a shared driveway easement. Derifield claims that the district court erred in determining that the Benningers have an express easement across the Derifield property and that Derifield’s interference with this claimed easement constituted a nuisance. On cross-appeal the Benningers maintain that the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. C & G, INC. v. RuleIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Sun Valley Shamrock Resources, Inc. v. Travelers Leasing Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Rowe v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Abbott v. Nampa School District No. 131Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Hodgins v. SalesIdaho Supreme Court · 2003

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Borah v. McCandlessIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Bettwieser v. New York Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Beckstead v. PriceIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Ray v. FrasureIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Jerry Machado v. Charles L. RyanIdaho Supreme Court · 2012

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API