Legal Opinion

Ray v. Frasure

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 2009No. 34311PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Justice.

This appeal concerns the validity of a contract for the sale of real property between appellant Don Frasure and respondents Remington Real Estate, Inc. (Remington) and Stan Ray (Remington and Ray collectively referred to as Respondents). Frasure appeals the district court’s ruling that the physical address in the contract sufficiently described the real property for purposes of the statute of frauds. We reverse the decision of the district court and conclude that a property description consisting solely of a physical address does not satisfy the statute of frauds.

I. FACTUAL…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. P.O. Ventures, Inc. v. Loucks Family Irrevocable TrustIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Bouten Construction Co. v. H.F. Magnuson Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Hoffman v. SV Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Allen v. KitchenIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Bolger v. LanceIdaho Supreme Court · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Callies v. O'NEALIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Kennedy v. SchneiderIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  3. The David and Marvel Benton Trust v. McCartyIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Nicholson v. Coeur D'Alene Placer Mining Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Rainsdon v. Garcia (In re Garcia)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2011

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API