Legal Opinion

State v. N.M.K.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 22, 2005No. 54767-4-IPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 Where the admissibility of testimonial evidence is at issue, the sixth amendment to the United *157States Constitution demands that the witness be unavailable at trial and that the accused had a prior opportunity to cross-examine the witness.1 While the full scope of what is included within “testimonial” evidence is not fully defined by the United States Supreme Court, that Court made clear that business records are generally not testimonial evidence.2 In this case, the trial court admitted into evidence a certified letter from the Department of Licensing (DOL) stating that no driver’s license…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. State v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Michels v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006
  2. State v. KirkpatrickWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. KirkpatrickWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. KronichWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Card v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API