Legal Opinion

State v. Kirkpatrick

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 2007No. 77719-5PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*876¶1 The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides defendant the right “to be confronted with the witnesses against him . . . ,”1 Under this “Confrontation Clause,” testimonial evidence may not be admitted at trial absent proof of the declarant’s unavailability and prior opportunity for cross-examination of the declarant by the accused.2 Not all evidence is testimonial, of course, but the United States Supreme Court has not provided a comprehensive definition of “testimonial” in this context.3 However, the Court’s express recognition that business records are not “testimonial”…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. State v. WiseWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. JasperWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. RobinsonWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. O'HARAWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. MillanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API