State v. Kirkpatrick
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*876¶1 The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides defendant the right “to be confronted with the witnesses against him . . . ,”1 Under this “Confrontation Clause,” testimonial evidence may not be admitted at trial absent proof of the declarant’s unavailability and prior opportunity for cross-examination of the declarant by the accused.2 Not all evidence is testimonial, of course, but the United States Supreme Court has not provided a comprehensive definition of “testimonial” in this context.3 However, the Court’s express recognition that business records are not “testimonial”…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- State v. WiseWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. JasperWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. RobinsonWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. O'HARAWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. MillanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.