State v. Kronich
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides every criminal defendant the right “to be confronted with the witnesses against him ... ,”1 Under this clause, “testimonial evidence may not be admitted at trial absent proof of the declarant’s unavailability and prior opportunity for cross-examination of the *897declarant by the accused.”2 The United States Supreme Court has yet to provide a comprehensive definition for “testimonial” evidence.3 However, the Court’s explicit acknowledgment that business records are not “testimonial” evidence provides a basis for concluding that…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- State v. WiseWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. MontgomeryWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. MontgomeryWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. JasperWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. KirkpatrickWashington Supreme Court · 2007
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.