State v. Young
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTalmadge, J.
We are asked in this case to determine if a police action constituted a disturbance of a person’s private affairs without lawful authority under article I, section 7 of the Washington Constitution. We hold the test for a disturbance of a person’s private affairs under article I, section 7 is a purely objective one, looking to the actions of the law enforcement officer, thus rejecting the test for a seizure under the Fourth Amendment articulated by the United States Supreme Court in California v. Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621, 111 S. Ct. 1547, 113 L. Ed. 2d 690 (1991). Applying our objective test,…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by134 opinions
- People v. LuedemannIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. O'NeillWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. MendezWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. MendezWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999
129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.