Legal Opinion
State v. Kirkpatrick
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 12, 2007No. 77719-5PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
161 P.3d 990 (2007)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Nathan Michael KIRKPATRICK, Petitioner.
No. 77719-5.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued October 17, 2006.
Decided July 12, 2007.
Dana M. Lind, Nielsen Broman & Koch PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.
Carla Barbieri Carlstrom, Catherine Marie McDowall, James Morrissey Whisman, King Co Prosecutor's Office, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.
Jerald R. Anderson, Attorney at Law, Atty General S Ofc., Olympia, WA, for Amicus Curiae on behalf of Washington State.
J.M. JOHNSON, J.
¶ 1 The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- State v. WiseWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. JasperWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. RobinsonWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. O'HARAWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. MillanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.