Legal Opinion
Childcraft Education Corp. v. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 29, 1984No. Appeal 83-1428PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Childcraft Education Corp. (Childcraft) appeals from the decision of the Court of International Trade (CIT), 572 F.Supp. 1275 (1983) which upheld the classification of the imported merchandise as toys, Item 737.90 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS) instead of as “Machines not specially provided for,” Item 678.50 TSUS, or “Electrical articles ... not specially provided for,” Item 688.40 TSUS, as claimed. We reverse.
Background
The imports are articles primarily used by children, and are respectively known as “Teaching Typewriters,” “Touch to Learn,”…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Daw Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Novelty Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- Childcraft Education Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Simod America Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Stewart-Warner Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Hasbro Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Bausch & Lomb, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.