Legal Opinion
Hasbro Industries, Inc. v. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 12, 1989No. 89-1202PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MICHEL, Circuit Judge.
Hasbro Industries, Inc. appeals the decision of the Court of International Trade, 703 F.Supp. 941 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1988), which determined that “G.I. Joe Action Figures” are within the common meaning of “dolls” and were properly classified as such under Item 737.24 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS). We affirm.
Background
The United States Customs Service classified “G.I. Joe Action Figures” imported from Hong Kong during 1982 and 1983 as “other dolls” under Item 737.24 of the TSUS. Under this classification, depending on the date of entry, various rates…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brookside Veneers, Ltd. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- Childcraft Education Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Russ Berrie & Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
- Hasbro Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
3Cited by34 opinions
- Lynteq, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- National Advanced Systems v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Digital Equipment Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Marcel Watch Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Nidec Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.