Legal Opinion

Stewart-Warner Corporation v. The United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided November 19, 1984No. Appeal 84-1041PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDWARD S. SMITH, Circuit Judge.

In this customs case, the initial classification by the United States Customs Service of certain speedometers as “other” speedometers was rejected by the United States Court of International Trade, which held instead that they should be classified as “bicycle” speedometers. Appellant, the United States (Government), appeals the judgment of the Court of International Trade. We reverse.

Issues

The principal issue before this court is whether the trial court erred, as a matter of law, in holding that certain imported speedometers of a “bicycle-type,” used primarily…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. Daw Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  3. Childcraft Education Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  4. Stewart-Warner Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  2. Brookside Veneers, Ltd. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  3. Sports Graphics, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  4. Marubeni America Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  5. E.M. Chemicals v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API