Legal Opinion
Bausch & Lomb, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided February 5, 1997No. Court No. 93-01-00028PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Musgrave, Judge:
Plaintiff Bausch & Lomb, Inc. (“B&L’) brings this action to contest the tariff classification by the United States Customs Service (“Customs”) of electric toothbrushes and toothbrush heads imported by B&L. Defendant Customs liquidated the entries as “Other appliances” under Subheading 8509.80.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) and B&L filed a timely protest which Customs denied. B&L claims that its entries of electric toothbrushes are properly classified as “Toothbrushes” under Subheading 9603.21.00 of the HTSUS. Both parties have…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- EM Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- H.I.M./Fathom, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- American Bayridge Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.